The Netbuilder Awards Proposal
The Netbuilder Awards
(This proposal draft was last updated Wed May 31 1996.)
Contents
- Introduction
- Purpose Of The Netbuilder Awards
- Who Will Give Out The Awards?
- What Will The Awards Be?
- Who Will Be Eligible?
- Who Will Pay For All This?
- Who Is Behind This Proposal?
- How To Get Involved
Free software and good works done for the Internet ought to be
rewarded. While the Internet culture of the past has been pretty good
at recognizing talent and hard work and rewarding it with prestige in
the community, the close-knit community awareness that sustained this
implicit reward structure seems unlikely to be sustainable as the
population of "cyberspace" explodes.
Accordingly, I think it's time to develop a more explicit reward
structure. I would like to try to assemble a group of prestigious
tribal elders of the free-software, Internet, and Linux/UNIX cultures
to give out periodic awards recognizing achievement in free software
and praiseworthy services to the Internet and its culture.
My tentative proposed name for these awards is the "Netbuilder" awards
(informally, "Spiders"). This is intended to refer not just to the
Internet and WWW but to the intangible webs of cooperation, voluntary
exchange, shared history, and trust that make the hacker culture
work.
The model I have in mind for the Netbuilder Awards is the "Hugo Awards" of
SF fandom. The Hugo tradition offers many procedural tips and
half-explicit traditions useful for organizing an award that rewards
excellence, affirms the community feeling of its constituency, and
manages not to be stuffy.
A worthy goal for the Netbuilder awards is that they develop a level of
prestige, authority, and benefits for their recipients in the net
culture analogous to or exceeding that of the Hugos within SF
fandom.
Purpose of the Netbuilders Awards
To reward and encourage excellence in free software. To reward and
encourage volunteer contributions to the net and the "hacker culture"
in its broadest sense, including the Internet and Usenet and all
places elsewhere that the hacker traditions of voluntary code- and
information-sharing, creativity, and cooperative individualism
reaches.
The Netbuilder awards will be issued by a non-profit 501(c)3
corporation formed for the purpose, the Netbuilder Foundation. This
corporation will recruit an awards committee composed of eminent
members of the free-software and Internet cultures, who will issue the
awards (generally based on recommendations received from the Internet
at large).
To support the Awards Committee, the Netbuilder Foundation will be
chartered to include a Governing Board and staff. Staff positions may
include a Director, Secretary/Archivist, and Treasurer (optionally, the
Grand, Puissant, and Totipotent Arachnids).
Membership in the Governing Board, Awards Committee and staff may and
often will overlap. Practice of the organization will be patterned
where applicable on nonprofit user-service groups such as Usenix and
professional societies such as ACM and IEEE.
Foundation business will be conducted primarily via email, IRC,
teleconferencing, the Web, and other network media appropriate to its
mission. Besides being symbolically appropriate, this will avoid
unnecessary demands on the face time of busy members!
There will be three different classes of awards:
-
Excellence awards for specific free-software or network-service
projects. These will consist of an engraved certificate and a
symbolic small cash award (perhaps $50-$100).
-
Lifetime Achievement awards made to persons with an outstanding record
of contributions to the free-software and Internet cultures. These
will consist of a trophy or award analogous to the Hugo rocketship,
a substantial cash award (perhaps as much as $1000-$5000), and an
entailed invitation to join the corporation's Board Of Directors
and/or Awards Committee.
-
Special awards made at the Committee's discretion. These will
consist of a plaque and a moderate-sized cash award (perhaps $250-$500).
The special awards will offer a way to experiment, and will be
expected to sometimes lead to the development of new "regular" categories
to go with the Excellence and Lifetime Achievement awards.
All awards will include a tasteful lapel pin in the form of a spider
(the original netbuilder) suitable for wear at professional
conferences and backyard beer bashes, and be recorded in a registry
page on the World Wide Web.
Rewards will typically go to individuals, but may occasionally at the
Awards Comittee's discretion be presented to a project group as a whole.
Excellence Awards
To be eligible for an Excellence award, the candidate(s) must originate
a program or information resource that is:
-
available without charge over the Internet.
-
deserving of recognition for utility, technical elegance, and/or
sheer hack value.
-
distributed in modifiable source form with a GPL, Berkeley-style
or "Artistic"-style license permitting free re-use and free redistribution.
(License provisions barring use or modification for profit may not
absolutely preclude eligibility, but will raise the bar on the other
standards considerably.)
-
if the candidate resource is a program, it must be possible to build
and run the program on a stock version of one of the widely-used
freeware operating systems (including but not limited to Linux,
FreeBSD and NetBSD).
Lifetime Achievement Awards
To be eligible for a Lifetime Achievement award, the candidate(s) must
have made an outstanding contribution to the hacker culture and the
Internet, through
-
unique and exceptional technical innovation that opened up
possibilities still resonant within the culture,
-
a long-standing record of service to the hacker culture and/or the net
as an organizer, role-model, doer of the utterly necessary but unexciting,
and/or tribal elder.
Where Excellence awards are intended to confer fame, the Lifetime Achievement
awards are intended to confirm a reputation already well-earned. Every
Lifetime Achievement awardee should be someone of whom the knowledgeable
will say "Well, of course!"
Special Awards
Special Awards may occasionally conferred at the Awards Committee's
discretion in cognizance of the charter purposes of the Netbuilder awards,
as a way of recognizing praiseworthy projects or conduct not covered
by the existing regular categories and, experimenting with new categories.
In 1994 I discussed an ancestor of this proposal with Rich Morin,
founder of Prime Time Software. He expressed the belief that many of
the small companies now making money redistributing Internet software
in CD and other form would contribute to an award program of this kind
both for sound business reasons (to encourage a bigger crop of free
software) and to express their appreciation of and solidarity with
the culture that produces free software.
I have since received tentative expressions of interest from a very
well-known software millionaire (no, not Bill the Gates!) who shall
remain nameless pending a decision to become more involved.
The Netbuilder Awards program as I envision it, cash awards and all, could
easily be run on a budget of $75K a year (that includes stipends for two
part-time positions to run the mechanics). I do not anticipate great
difficulty raising this volume of cash.
This proposal has not yet been broadcast. If you're reading it, you
probably know who I am. If by any chance you don't, see my home page
at http://www.ccil.org/~esr.
My qualifications for founding this award series and the organization
to go with it are three:
- As the editor of the Jargon File
and through various other projects, I think I've established contacts and a
network reputation sufficient that the attempt will at least not be dismissed
out of hand before it has a chance to establish itself.
- I've co-founded and helped run a successful Internet-related nonprofit
organization (Chester County InterLink)
and thus have some idea how to make the nuts and bolts work.
- Last but hardly least, I thought up the idea and I believe in it.
A few people in a position to help make this concept work have told me I can
use their names to help stimulate more interest in it. These people
include Richard M. Stallman, Henry Spencer, Rich Morin, and Mitch Kapor.
If you are seeing the proposal at this early stage, it's probably
because I want you as a member of the Netbuilder Foundation's charter
Governing Board or Awards Committee, or both; or, I think you can
suggest candidates for these positions; or, I think you can line up an
institutional sponsor; or, I think you otherwise have wisdom to
offer.
So, please email me. Tell me
what you think; tell me how you'd like to help. Tell me how we can
make this concept work.
I think the early decision most critical to the effort will be who
will be the charter members of the Awards Committee. For the award to
develop the proper weight, all the members must have sufficient public
prestige that any halfway-knowledgeable hacker reading the list would
readily grant them them Lifetime Achievement status.
Here is my notion of an Awards Committee "dream team":
marca@mcom.com (Marc Andreesen)
James.Gosling@sun.com (James Gosling)
Bill.Joy@sun.com (Bill Joy)
bwk@research.att.com (Brian Kernighan)
dmr@research.att.com (Dennis Ritchie)
henry@zoo.toronto.edu (Henry Spencer)
rms@mole.ai.mit.edu (Richard M. Stallman)
Guy.Steele@sun.com (Guy Steele)
ken@research.att.com (Ken Thompson)
Linus.Torvalds@cs.Helsinki.FI (Linus Torvalds)
All these people are being asked to join.
I will be setting up an Internet mailing list,
spiders@ccil.org, to carry
forward this proposal.
Eric S. Raymond <esr@snark.thyrsus.com>